网站首页 手机版 网站地图 TAG标签

设为首页 加入收藏

当前位置: 主页 > 英语文章阅读 > 双语资讯 >

《中国3.0》:中国式辩论 On the cusp of China’s third revolution

更新时间:2013-01-10    来源/发布:www.en369.cn    作者/编辑:英语作文网

《中国3.0》:中国式辩论 On the cusp of China’s third revolution

China is a one-party state, where the media remains tightly controlled. But do not make the mistake of assuming that has killed off intellectual debate. On the contrary, there is a ferment of discussion there today about the future of the country and its role in the world. China 3.0, edited by Mark LeonardPublished by European Council on Foreign Relations (Downloadable at ECFR.eu, Not sure what the price is …They may be giving it away)
《中国3.0》(China 3.0),马克•伦纳德(Mark Leonard)编,欧洲对外关系委员会(European Council on Foreign Relations, ECFR)出版(可从ECFR.eu网站下载,价格不详,可能免费)
In some ways, these debates are more interesting than their equivalent arguments in the west. That is because the debates in Europe or the US are dominated by a broad mainstream acceptance of certain basic principles about democracy, capitalism and the international order.
中国是一个一党制国家,媒体仍然受到严格管制。但如果以为思想辩论因此遭到扼杀,那就错了。相反,中国学者正在激烈讨论着国家的未来以及它在世界上的角色。
By contrast, Chinese intellectuals are still arguing about really fundamental issues. Is liberal democracy the way forward – or should the country seek its own political settlement, rooted in Confucian values? Did it go too far in its embrace of liberal capitalism or not far enough? If it becomes a superpower, should it try to reshape the world system or should it accept the existing institutions?
在某种程度上,这些辩论比西方的对应辩论更有意思。原因是,欧洲或美国的辩论建立在主流对某些基本原则的广泛认可之上,比如关于民主、资本主义和国际秩序的原则。
The great virtue of China 3.0 – a short collection of essays by Chinese intellectuals – is that it gives an insight into the vigour and variety of some of these debates. According to Mark Leonard, the editor of the volume, China 1.0 was Mao Zedong’s communist revolution, China 2.0 was Deng Xiaoping’s market revolution – and China 3.0 is yet to emerge, but could be just as revolutionary.
与此形成对照的是,中国知识分子还在争辩极为根本的问题。自由民主是否是未来的发展方向?抑或,中国应以儒家价值观为本,寻找自己的政治出路?中国对自由资本主义的接受程度是过了头,还是仍不到位?如果中国成为超级大国,它应当重塑世界体系,还是接受现有制度?
Sensitive readers should not be put off by the whiff of sensationalism, and the slightly hackneyed “3.0”
《中国3.0》是中国知识分子的短篇文集,其主要优点是让外界深入洞察其中一些辩论的活力和多样性。按照文集编者马克•伦纳德的说法,中国1.0是毛泽东的共产主义革命,中国2.0是邓小平的市场革命,中国3.0尚未出现,但可能具有同等的变革意义。
formulation. In his introduction, Leonard provides a useful categorisation of the debates featured in the book. On economics, he sees a dividing line between a “social Darwinist New Right” and an “egalitarian New Left”. In politics, he argues that the main divide is between “political liberals” and “neo-authoritarians”. And in foreign policy, he identifies a split between “defensive internationalists” and newly assertive nationalists.

本文标签

专题推荐

更多相关

本站简介- 站内公告- 原创投稿- 广告服务- 版权声明- 联系我们 - 手机访问
Copyright @ 2008-2018 英语作文网 online services. Security support by en369.cn